Monthly Archives: February 2006
What are you hiding behind those password protected doors?
I use Bloglines. Straight up. I haven’t found a (web-based) RSS reader that allows me to get through as many feeds as quickly as Bloglines. The keyboard shortcuts are a revelation unto the application, just as they were when Gmail brought them to life. And now they have new icons for the folders and feeds! Wow! I guess they must have decided that the interface wasn’t glossy enough.*
But (there’s always a but, right?)…
Rojo‘s got tags. Yeah, tags are probably a little overrated since they’ve been used in every New Web app since the very invention of tags. But here …by here, I mean, in a feed reader… there is a utility that I often dream about when “s”ing and “j”ing through Bloglines. I would no longer be restrained by having to sort my feeds into folders by category and then naming those folders so they sort in order of the ones that I usually want to read first. Because that “usually” is critical. The keystone, if you will.
With tags, I no longer have folders named like “01 Basketball – 01 News”… I can have a “basketball news” tag, and, if I find that some news sources are more reliable (or perhaps more well written) than others, I can add a tag called “Pri 01” (or maybe even just “01”). So, now, when I’m strapped for time, I don’t have to sift through any blogs that aren’t really that important to get to FreeDarko or the Fantasy Basketblog.
The only problem is that Rojo does not (yet) have keyboard navigation. But, just writing about using the tags has worked me up into such a lather that I almost want to make the switch right now. I’m afraid that the sacrifice would just be too much to bear, though. And so, I will soldier on with the currently slightly better of two options.
* The drag and drop reorg would have been nice when I did mine 2 months ago. Too late now, though… so I’m having trouble giving credit for that one…
Okay… So the title of the post is a bit misleading. I’m not going to tell you how to decide on steps for professional development. I don’t even know myself. That’s what this post is about. I just felt it was better to leave the Question Mark off the title… SEO reasons, ya heard?
Also obfuscating the issue is the fact that my “shop”, as it were, is mostly invested in Java and Java-related technologies, but there are a few Flash programmers who rock their “specialist” label like it was an oversized clock. Can I step up to be a Flash playa in control of the Flash player? Or is it enough to have a few people doing the Flash stuff, and concentrate on skills that are probably more widely applicable in the realm of web development?
Nels Wadycki: Thinking out loud on the daily.
SitePoint’s PHP Blog (of all places):
AJAX is used to enhance existing HTML forms / user interaction but the fundamental paradigm is still the same as “normal” web applications. Some key smells of this style;
- Page reloads still happen frequently
- It’s possible (if you make the effort) to degrade gracefully to non-supporting browsers / browsers with JS turned off.
- Session state still resides on the server.
Some of the key smells with Client / SOA;
- Page reloads are rare, if at all. The application tends to run in a single browser window.
- It’s practically impossible to degrade gracefully, without maintaining seperate code bases.
- Session state is largely handled by the client.
- It’s going to require specialist developers
Most people reading this have probably had some experience with Gmail, so you know that it fits in the first category above (now known as HTML++).
I took a free trial month with Mvelopes, and while I couldn’t justify the $8/month for their program (not when I’ve got Yodlee), it was good just to see what kind of things are possible in the world of “Client/SOA” web applications. We’re going to have to come up with a better name for that, right? Yeah. I would recommend that web developers (not so much the designers as the developers) take a look at it. The free trial is surprisingly easy to cancel when you’ve checked it out.
Our research suggests one difficulty in building out the design pattern library is starting to catalog the current set of elements. It takes a push from the library creators, but once it’s completed, the value seems to be immediate: teams can start to discuss what works and what doesn’t in current designs, laying out a vision for future development.
While more useful than the Department of Redundancy Department, I find the Design Pattern of a Design Pattern decription somewhat humorous. I would say ironic, but I’m no English major.
I guess if everyone follows the DPOADP, then it works. Just hope that Microsoft doesn’t have a different Design Pattern for their Design Patterns or it’s going to be an uphill battle both ways. In the snow. Barefoot.
And yes, I did find the link above in Yahoo’s User Interface Design Blog.