←

Nels Wadycki

Month: May 2007

  • Swaptree – I can see why money was invented

    Nels W

    I’m in the beta of swaptree, and after listing a bunch of stuff, I found something I have that apparently is of some value to someone else. The DVD of Hitchcock’s North by Northwest is the first item I’ve listed that people have actually wanted to trade for. Initially, there wasn’t anyone who had something on my “want” list who also wanted NxNW. But, the magic of swaptree worked quickly and soon I was united with someone who wanted NxNW and had something I wanted!

    The Web 2.0 induced buzz wore off quickly, though. The item being offered in trade for this DVD was a book – a simple paperback book – and not one of the ones that I was really hoping for. I figured that sort of problem would come up when you have a site that’s trading things as diverse as books, CDs, DVDs, and video games. Those are essentially 4 different price points, and the only way to get over that is to swap things that you consider to be of the lowest common denominator of value – that being the book (paperback books, that is). So, when swaptree found someone who had a paperback I wanted, and that person wanted my DVD, I felt like I should be getting more for the DVD than a paperback.

    To confirm this feeling I had, I checked Amazon and found that I could get the paperback for $0.01 + $3.99 shipping for a total of $4. If I were to sell the movie, I’d get $7.99 – $2.99 commission + $2.99 shipping credit – $2.00 actual shipping = $5.99. I just lost $1.99. Yeah, yeah, I’m an IT professional and I make enough money that I can give up a measly two dollars. Until I’ve made 10 trades and then I’m out almost 20 dollars. I can buy stuff for 20 bucks. I mean, if I you look at those paperbacks that are $4 each, that’s five more books I could read.

    Another “swapping” site that I’m trying out is BookMooch. Now, as should be obvious from the name, only books are exchanged on BookMooch, but knowing what we know about the previous scenario, it does make things easier. The site gives you a “point” for sending a book to someone. Then you can “buy” a book from someone else for that point. Of course, there’s still room for some arbitrage there, but you don’t get into as much of a gray area as when trading books for DVDs or CDs for video games. In addition, since you get points for every book you send out, you don’t have to wait to find someone to trade with. Maybe I’m showing a little too much faith, but I sent out a few books before I even “mooched” my first; I’ve still sent out more than I’m due to receive, but I’m feeling good about the whole process. I know I won’t be able to trade my MoochPoints for real money like I can with my buckets of Linden dollars, but I (and everyone using the site) knows the value of those points, whereas swaptree relies on me denying trades to establish a value for my items.

    Now… if only there was a place I could go where I could send anything I wanted to get rid of and get “EverythingPoints” and then use those “EverythingPoints” to buy whatever I wanted. Maybe when Web 3.0 gets here…

  • Nothing to Download

    Nels W

    I’ve actually been sitting on this post for about 6 months – which is about how often I manage to post here, so you can kind of see how the process goes.

    It wasn’t a revelation in the sense that it led to some insight or allowed me access to new knowledge, but I’m not sure how else to describe it…

    something like this…

    My wife: You can email me, or I’ll be on Gchat when I’m in my email.

    Her friend: Yeah, it’s nice that you don’t have to download anything.

    That’s it. Simple as that. Nothing to download.

    Now, my wife and her friend (and her friends in general) are technologically savvy, but aren’t the techie type nor usually early adopters. I guess this is part of the genius of Google. It was a lot more obvious when they rewrote pretty much every rule that existed with the release of Gmail. And while the addition of GChat [ed: and now chat in Yahoo Mail] is certainly less revolutionary, it’s another indication of where this all is headed.

    Of course, as far as I can tell right now, the advantage of GChat over chat in Yahoo Mail is that GChat saves all your chats for you. It even does that when you chat using the downloaded version of the client. Yahoo Messenger saves your chat history on your hard drive. Now that you can chat in Yahoo Mail, it would certainly make sense to update that. [ed: they might have done that already, but I haven’t opened up the thick client for YMessenger in a while – it’s all about Trilian as the thinnest thick client there is]

    The addition of Yahoo Web Messenger adds another level of importance to the need for syncing that history. YWM will save your history to the web, so I’m not sure if YMail also does that now as well. I could probably test it, but I’m lazy.

    Since I’m writing this post now and not 6 months ago, I do feel that it warrants a mention that YWM is done in Flash/Flex. Not Silverlight. Yes, Silverlight just hit beta this week. But with what those Metaliq guys have done with it already, it would seem that Yahoo could have done Web Messenger that way if they wanted.

    And since I’m inviting fanatics from both sides just by putting the words in the post, I might as well link to one of my favorite posts ever from Eric Dolecki.